Margaux Komano vs Sasha Natalie Chimedza Head-to-Head Stats, Results & Performance Comparison
Wojtek Kolan
Published on 14 Oct at 12:20 AM UTC
HEAD TO HEAD
M. Komano vs S. Natalie Chimedza

FRA
1
Win
Played
0
Win

ZIM
1
Win
Played
0
Win
Head-to-head: Komano 1 - 0 Chimedza
They have played 2 sets in total, with Margaux Komano winning 2 and Sasha Natalie Chimedza winning 0. The last match between Margaux Komano and Sasha Natalie Chimedza was at the W15 Monastir, 14-10-2025, Round: Q3, Surface: Hard, with Margaux Komano getting the victory 6-2 6-3.
| Players | Head To Head Match Wins |
|---|---|
| Komano | 1 |
| Chimedza | 0 |
Last 1 H2H Matches:
(Q3) W15 Monastir(10-14-25)
M. Komano vs S. N. Chimedza H2H Profile
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| $0 | Career Prize Money | $0 |
| 46.09% (112-131) | Career Total W/L | 48.65% (18-19) |
| 1 | Hard | 0 |
| 1 | Total H2H Matches | 0 |
| 0% (0-0) | YTD Win/Loss | 0% (0-0) |
M. Komano vs S. N. Chimedza Match Preview:
- Margaux Komano recently has a slight edge over Sasha Natalie Chimedza in second serve performance, winning 38.70% of points compared to Chimedza's 37.27%.
- On returning second serves, Komano shows strength with 51.45% of points won, surpassing Chimedza's 44.29%.
- In first serve returns, Chimedza holds a slight lead, winning 35.88% compared to Komano’s 34.36%.
- Their ability to save breakpoints is nearly identical, with Komano at 45.75% and Chimedza at 45.56%.
- Overall, Chimedza had a better match-winning percentage in the past year, with 59.09% compared to Komano's 54.90%.
- Both players share the same best surface win percentage on Hard courts, at 47%.
- In terms of career bests, both excel on Hard courts, but Chimedza also maintains a decent 50% win rate on the same surface in a smaller sample size.
- Over the past year, Chimedza has fared better against higher-ranked opponents, facing an average rank of 124.77, while Komano's opponents averaged 184.92.
- Komano shows superior performance in deciding sets, winning 67% in the last year compared to Chimedza's 50%.
Editorial Prediction (October 14, 2025, UTC):
As Margaux Komano and Sasha Natalie Chimedza prepare to face off, several key factors come into play. Komano excels slightly in second serve performance and return games over the recent months, giving her a potential edge. However, Chimedza's capability to face higher-ranked opponents adds an intriguing layer to this matchup.
While both players have their strengths, Komano's ability to perform in deciding sets and her overall stronger return game could prove advantageous. Sasha Natalie Chimedza, though, holds a consistent match-winning streak over the past year.
Considering these elements, and despite Chimedza's recent success, Margaux Komano seems better poised to clinch the victory with her overall better performance patterns, especially in high-pressure scenarios.
Margaux Komano vs Sasha Natalie Chimedza Editorial Preview By TennisTipster88.
M. Komano vs S. N. Chimedza H2H Stats Used In Our Predictions
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 1 | H2H Matches Won | 0 |
| 2 | Sets Won | 0 |
| 12 | Games Won | 5 |
| 1 | Total Double Faults | 4 |
| 1:21:18 | Average Match Time | 1:21:18 |
| 69% (38/55) | 1st Serve % | 66% (35/53) |
| 68% (26/38) | 1st Serve Win % | 60% (21/35) |
| 41% (7/17) | 2nd Serve Win % | 17% (3/18) |
| 56% (5/9) | Break Pts Won % | 40% (2/5) |
| 55% (29/53) | Return Points Win % | 40% (22/55) |
| 100% (1/1) | Best‑of‑3 Win % | 0% (0/1) |
| 100% (1/1) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/1) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 0% (0/0) |
| 0% (0/0) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 0% (0/1) |
Recent Performance Stats
M. Komano Recent Matches Played
S. N. Chimedza Recent Matches Played

M. Komano vs S. N. Chimedza Stats Breakdown Vs All H2H Opponents
| Stats | ||
|---|---|---|
| 46.09% (112/131) | YTD Win/Loss | 48.65% (18/19) |
| 46.53% (255/293) | Sets Win/Loss | 48.84% (42/44) |
| 49.00% (2512/2615) | Games Win/Loss | 48.54% (398/422) |
| 47.34% (80/89) | Hard Win/Loss | 48.65% (18/19) |
| 44.07% (26/33) | Clay Win/Loss | 0% (0/0) |
| 40.00% (6/9) | Indoor Hard W/L | 0% (0/0) |
| 0.03 | Aces Per Game | 0.05 |
| 78 | Aces Total | 20 |
| 0.12 | Double Faults Per Game | 0.11 |
| 307 | Total Double Faults | 43 |
| 1st Match | Average Match Time | 1st Match |
| 278.05 | Average Opponent Rank | 96.59 |
| 70% (5059/7259) | 1st Serve % | 63% (691/1100) |
| 55% (2773/5059) | 1st Serve Win % | 57% (397/691) |
| 40% (882/2200) | 2nd Serve Win % | 38% (155/409) |
| 50% (398/795) | Break Points Won % (Total) | 51% (53/104) |
| 45% (3185/7073) | Return Points Win % | 42% (443/1054) |
| 32.14% (9/19) | Challenger W/L | 40.00% (2/3) |
| 47.91% (103/112) | Futures W/L | 50.00% (16/16) |
| 46% (111/241) | Best of 3 Sets Win % | 49% (18/37) |
| 33% (12/36) | Tiebreaks Win % (Total) | 43% (3/7) |
| 50% (32/64) | Deciding Set Win % | 50% (6/12) |
| 87% (111/97) | 1st Set Won, Won Match | 85% (20/17) |
| 13% (111/14) | 1st Set Won, Lost Match | 15% (20/3) |
| 11% (132/14) | 1st Set Lost, Won Match | 6% (17/1) |